![do i need nvidia physx with amd card do i need nvidia physx with amd card](https://nvworld.ru/files/news/gpuz-0-7-9-updated/gpuz-079.jpg)
- Do i need nvidia physx with amd card drivers#
- Do i need nvidia physx with amd card driver#
- Do i need nvidia physx with amd card software#
- Do i need nvidia physx with amd card Pc#
- Do i need nvidia physx with amd card series#
In all fairness, NVIDIA actually disabled cross-GPU support several months ago, but the fact that it's gone carries more weight than precisely when it disappeared.įor now, NVIDIA users who want to combine CUDA / PhysX and ATI can simply keep using the v185.85 driver. From their collective perspective, their chosen GPU vendor could be removing product functionality because it's feeling the heat from ATI's new Radeon HD 5870 / 5850 parts. In its desire to deny ATI seat at the table, NVIDIA is removing feature support from the group of people most likely to identify as loyal NVIDIA customers. NVIDIA's position is understandable, but the company, in our view, could be making a mistake.
![do i need nvidia physx with amd card do i need nvidia physx with amd card](http://www.ozone3d.net/public/jegx/201005/physx_fluidmark_1.2.0.jpg)
This is particularly cogent given the newly released Radeon HD 5800 series' strong performance. If consumers start repurposing a significant percentage of all those NVIDIA cards as add-in PhysX boards, or buy low-end boards to do the same thing, NVIDIA's top-end sales could fall. Numbers like these make it easier for NVIDIA to push PhysX support from the developer side, but there's a catch. In this case, the top ten accounts for 53.86% of the video cards in use on Steam.
Do i need nvidia physx with amd card series#
Under XP, the 8800 series has 15.28% of the market and 9 of the top 10 spots.
![do i need nvidia physx with amd card do i need nvidia physx with amd card](http://www.volnapc.com/uploads/3/0/9/1/30918989/3876057_orig.jpg)
In Vista, the (mostly) G80-based 8800 series accounts for 5.11% of all cards sampled NVIDIA holds nine of the top 10 spots, which account for 18.25% of the total. Not only does NVIDIA hold the lion's share of the market, it dominates the percentage breakdown of DX10-capable GPUs in both XP and Vista. The data below is drawn from the hardware survey available from Valve's Steam on-line content distribution system. Paradoxically, however, the success of the G80 and G92 series makes pushing PhysX as an add-on capability even more unappealing for the company. If NVIDIA wants to push PhysX adoption, it should be encouraging gamers to purchase (or repurpose) an NVIDIA GPU for use as a dedicated PhysX card.
![do i need nvidia physx with amd card do i need nvidia physx with amd card](https://all-freeload.net/images/programs/screenshot/system/emulyatory/nvidia-physx2.jpg)
Features that are only available from a single manufacturer tend to be limited to niche adoption or go unused.
Do i need nvidia physx with amd card driver#
FSAA and AF became popular partly because these were features that could be activated or deactivated by the video card's driver and did not require the game developers to (typically) write additional code.
Do i need nvidia physx with amd card software#
Historically, the speed of and degree to which software developers adopt any given video card technology correlates with the percentage of consumers able to take advantage of it and the difficulty of writing programs that utilize it. While the PhysX engine has been a reasonably popular software physics solution, the number of games that actually support hardware-accelerated PhysX is still fairly small.
Do i need nvidia physx with amd card Pc#
The Tension Between PhysX Uptake and Corporate ProfitsĮver since it bought Ageia in 2008, NVIDIA has been calling on developers to offload physics calculations to the GPU via the company's PhysX engine, which is freely available to anyone interested in developing for the Xbox 360, PS3, or PC (both Linux and Windows). Customers-particularly those who consider themselves loyal customers-may very well see the forced incompatibility as a predatory move intended to force customers to use NVIDIA solutions. In taking it, however, NVIDIA is taking a significant risk. Locking out ATI today (and, we suppose, future Larrabee cards) is a logical business step. NVIDIA has invested a lot of money and time into PhysX and PhysX development the company has good reason not to want to hand all of its hard work over to competitors. When asked for the reason behind the change, an NVIDIA representative stated: "For a variety of reasons - some development expense some quality assurance and some business reasons NVIDIA will not support GPU accelerated PhysX with NVIDIA GPUs while GPU rendering is happening on non-NVIDIA GPUs." From a certain perspective, this definitely makes sense.
Do i need nvidia physx with amd card drivers#
That's what's happened over at NGOHQ, where forum reader DarthCyclonis discovered that NVIDIA drivers released after the v185.85 WHQL package (i.e, 186.18 and higher) removed the ability to use a GeForce 8xxx, 9xxx, or 2xx card as a dedicated PhysX processor if an non-NVIDIA GPU is present. Every so often, someone on the 'Net stumbles across something noteworthy, but the news doesn't spread until weeks or maybe even months later.